<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Cheating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/</link>
	<description>This Is Le Style</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lestyle</title>
		<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>lestyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 08:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Trinity, only the Le Style moderator has the right to moderate comments. Please relax.

I have received your comment, I have it here, but I can't approve it, as there's a bug causing it (and a few other comments, sorry Jean and Shawn) to be rejected. However I will post it here now so that it's published for you.

QUOTE TRINITY - OCTOBER 3rd - 15.45GMT
"
There is no law there at the moment to say that it is a criminal offence, not to my knowledge anyway and I've worked in legal.  Not here in Ireland and not that I am aware of in the UK. However, there was a report back in April 2007 and actually a UK law firm released a report on same quite recently as well, but it was just a report.   The European Commission did put forward a proposal to strengthen the criminal law framework to combat intellectual property law offences but this was withdrawn and instead its provisions incorporated into a Directive (proposal!)

..In the directive, all intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale, including attempting, aiding and abetting such infringements, are treated as criminal offences. 

I'm not sure of the exact 'ins and outs' but per se :) but that's about the jist of it.
"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trinity, only the Le Style moderator has the right to moderate comments. Please relax.</p>
<p>I have received your comment, I have it here, but I can&#8217;t approve it, as there&#8217;s a bug causing it (and a few other comments, sorry Jean and Shawn) to be rejected. However I will post it here now so that it&#8217;s published for you.</p>
<p>QUOTE TRINITY - OCTOBER 3rd - 15.45GMT<br />
&#8221;<br />
There is no law there at the moment to say that it is a criminal offence, not to my knowledge anyway and I&#8217;ve worked in legal.  Not here in Ireland and not that I am aware of in the UK. However, there was a report back in April 2007 and actually a UK law firm released a report on same quite recently as well, but it was just a report.   The European Commission did put forward a proposal to strengthen the criminal law framework to combat intellectual property law offences but this was withdrawn and instead its provisions incorporated into a Directive (proposal!)</p>
<p>..In the directive, all intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale, including attempting, aiding and abetting such infringements, are treated as criminal offences. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure of the exact &#8216;ins and outs&#8217; but per se :) but that&#8217;s about the jist of it.<br />
&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trinity</title>
		<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Trinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>To Frankie..
There are copyright laws.
On a slight tangent, we have a big case going on here in Ireland at the mo, Dunnes Stores and Karen Millen

http://www.independent.ie/national-news/dunnes-stores-copied-rivals-fashion-designs-court-hears-1114874.html


http://www.rte.ie/business/2007/1002/dunnes.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Frankie..<br />
There are copyright laws.<br />
On a slight tangent, we have a big case going on here in Ireland at the mo, Dunnes Stores and Karen Millen</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.ie/national-news/dunnes-stores-copied-rivals-fashion-designs-court-hears-1114874.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.ie/national-news/dunnes-stores-copied-rivals-fashion-designs-court-hears-1114874.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rte.ie/business/2007/1002/dunnes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rte.ie/business/2007/1002/dunnes.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trinity</title>
		<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Trinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>hmmm just wondering Martapiotroska why you removed my comment to the effect that there is NO law at the moment to say that's it's a criminal offence. There are reports and recommendations but no law as such. Just wondering like :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm just wondering Martapiotroska why you removed my comment to the effect that there is NO law at the moment to say that&#8217;s it&#8217;s a criminal offence. There are reports and recommendations but no law as such. Just wondering like :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martapiotrowska</title>
		<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>martapiotrowska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Frankie, the fact that immitations (of anything) are illegal is rather obvious - don't you think?

With the bags and designer stuff is not even as much about the copyright of the bag design, it's about using designer's logo or a logo which is really similar, just mispelled name etc,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankie, the fact that immitations (of anything) are illegal is rather obvious - don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>With the bags and designer stuff is not even as much about the copyright of the bag design, it&#8217;s about using designer&#8217;s logo or a logo which is really similar, just mispelled name etc,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: margretgisladottir</title>
		<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>margretgisladottir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/#comment-672</guid>
		<description>Yes this is true. I read about this a while ago. And it's not just bags, it's sunglasses, jewlery, watches and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this is true. I read about this a while ago. And it&#8217;s not just bags, it&#8217;s sunglasses, jewlery, watches and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankie</title>
		<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>I think that's going too far, what happens when they've copyrighted every possible design?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s going too far, what happens when they&#8217;ve copyrighted every possible design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martapiotrowska</title>
		<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>martapiotrowska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>buying immitations of all sorts (bags, shoes, watches) is illegal, always was. 

In this particular case with the bags it has started quite recently in Tokyo, NYC, Milan, Paris and a few other big cities. It's about all possible brands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buying immitations of all sorts (bags, shoes, watches) is illegal, always was. </p>
<p>In this particular case with the bags it has started quite recently in Tokyo, NYC, Milan, Paris and a few other big cities. It&#8217;s about all possible brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markwrafter</title>
		<link>http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>markwrafter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lestyleblog.com/2007/09/27/no-cheating/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Marta, is this true, purchasing these bags is now a criminal offence. Any idea to what other designer imitations it extends, watches and jewellery too, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marta, is this true, purchasing these bags is now a criminal offence. Any idea to what other designer imitations it extends, watches and jewellery too, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

